OPINION- In a decision that has drawn widespread criticism, Ugandan Members of Parliament have chosen to allocate 5 billion Ugandan Shillings for the establishment of a regional parliament, rather than providing compensation to the victims of the Kiteezi landslide. This decision has raised serious concerns about the MPs’ priorities and motivations, particularly given the pressing humanitarian needs following the disaster.
The choice to allocate such a substantial amount for a regional parliament, instead of addressing the immediate needs of disaster victims, underscores a significant misalignment in priorities. The Kiteezi landslide resulted in a tragic loss of life and extensive damage to the local community. Many families continue to struggle in the aftermath, lacking essential resources to rebuild their lives. Over 25 people have died from the landslide.
Directing funds towards compensation and support could have offered much-needed relief to those affected, aiding in their recovery and helping restore their livelihoods.
With 5 billion Ugandan Shillings, the government could have substantially improved the situation for the Kiteezi landslide victims. These funds could have been used to provide direct financial compensation to affected families, ensuring access to basic necessities such as shelter, food, and medical care. Additionally, the funds could have been allocated to rebuilding infrastructure, such as homes and community facilities, destroyed during the landslide. Investing in disaster preparedness and mitigation measures could also help prevent future tragedies, ultimately saving lives and resources.
This decision has also raised questions about the tribal and personal interests of the MPs involved. Critics argue that it reflects a tendency to prioritize projects that benefit specific regions or groups, rather than addressing broader national concerns. Such tribalism can perpetuate divisions within the country and hinder efforts to achieve equitable development.
Allegations of corruption within the Ugandan Parliament further compound the disappointment with this decision. The perception that funds are being misallocated or used to serve personal or political interests undermines public trust in government institutions. This erodes confidence in the ability of elected officials to make decisions that serve the best interests of all citizens, rather than a select few.
The decision has been met with particular disappointment regarding MPs who failed to stand in solidarity with other regions affected by disasters. By not advocating for the needs of all Ugandans, these MPs risk being seen as neglecting their broader responsibilities. This decision underscores the need for greater accountability and transparency in the allocation of public funds, ensuring that the most pressing needs of citizens are prioritized.
𝘼𝙣𝙣𝙤𝙮𝙚𝙙 𝙮𝙤𝙪𝙩𝙝
𝙍𝙞𝙘𝙝𝙖𝙧𝙙 𝘼𝙥𝙞𝙡 𝙤𝙣𝙚𝙣𝙘𝙖𝙣
0789600998
