Balaam Barugahara Ateenyi

The Minister of Local Government, Hon. Balam Barugahara Ateenyi, has reportedly ordered the State House Anti-Corruption Unit to interdict and investigate 29 civil servants from Ntungamo District and Ntungamo Municipality over alleged irregularities.

The directive is expected to pave the way for investigations into the conduct of the affected officials, although the specific allegations against each individual have not been detailed in the information available.

Among the officials named in connection with Ntungamo District are :

1. Kiiza Fedelis- the former Deputy Ntungamo CAO

2. Lawrence Bitaramunda- chief finance officer 

3. Niwagaba Gerald – Principal assistant secretary 

4. Tukundane Mary- former principal human resource officer 

5. Muhairwe Jenipher -current principal human resource officer 

6. Eng Kushemererwa- district engineer 

7. Ntare Denis DEO

8. Byamukama Emmanuel- Town Rubaare then

9. Tindimwebwa Alex- sub county chief Ntungamo then

10. Moses Atwiine -Town eng Rubaare

11. Rubaare land committee 

12. Eng Prosper Butubuura -district water engineer

13. Ndifuna Mathius -former CAO

14. Caleb Ezrah -principal internal auditor 

15. Ahabwe Amelin- procurement officer 

16. Makafu Moses- senior procurement officer 

17. Kwesigamukama Ezrah -senior internal auditor 

18. Katusiime David Kabaka -secretary to the service commission 

19. Alex Twebuuze -chairman district service commission.

20. Muriisa Frank -former parish chief 

21. Muhinda Fred- Kitwe Town engineer 

22. Rukundo Johnson – Accountant Kafunjo Mirama Town council 

NTUNGAMO Municipality 

1. Tumwesigye Isaiah -former Town clerk 

2. Eng Ankunzire Frank -assistant engineer 

3. Eng Tumusiime Fred -Municipality engineer

4. Niwamanya Banex -principal accountant

5. Niwagira Fred- senior human resource officer 

6. Felix Turyajunwa- environmental officer 

7. Sunday Hamdan- senior procurement officer 

The reported action signals renewed scrutiny of public administration in the district and municipality, with the proposed investigations expected to establish whether any wrongdoing occurred and identify those responsible.

However, interdiction and investigation do not amount to a finding of guilt.